Share This

Friday, 7 November 2025

Major consumer fix for car loans

 

New rules on the way: A woman viewing a car to buy at a Proton showroom in Petaling Jaya. The recently passed Hire Purchase (Amendment) Bill 2025 abolishes the front-loaded interest method for fixed-rate hire purchase loans and replaces it with the reducing balance system. — AZHAR

Economists say legal amendments will improve fairness in auto financing

PETALING JAYA: The newly passed Hire Purchase (Amendment) Bill 2025 which will overhaul how interest is calculated for fixed-rate car loans, marks a major reform in consumer credit, say economists.

The change, they say, was long overdue, describing it as a major step forward for consumer fairness and financial literacy.

The Bill, approved by the Dewan Rakyat on Oct 8, abolishes the long-criticised flat rate and Rule of 78 interest methods and replaces them with the reducing balance system and effective interest rate (EIR) calculation.

ALSO READ: Consumer groups hail amended Bill

Under the old Rule of 78, borrowers effectively paid more interest at the start of the loan, leaving them with little benefit even if they settled their hire purchase early.

The new reducing balance method, however, calculates interest only on the outstanding loan amount, making repayment fairer and more transparent.

Putra Business School economist Assoc Prof Dr Ida Yasin said the move would bring Malaysia in line with global standards and make loan structures easier for consumers to understand.

“In the past, interest was charged on the full loan amount even after you have paid off half of it.

“With the reducing balance system, interest is only calculated on what you still owe, which is a more equitable and accurate reflection of your debt,” she said.

Ida also agreed that the reform represented a move toward fairness, adding that the reducing balance system was “better than before” because it corrected a long-standing imbalance between lenders and consumers.

The Bill, tabled by the Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Ministry, is now at the Dewan Negara.

Once passed by the Senate, it will await royal assent from the Yang di-Pertuan Agong before being gazetted and enforced on a date to be announced by the ministry.

It also provides an 18-month transition period for banks and finance companies to fully implement the new calculation system.

Ida said the timeframe was “realistic and doable”, given the need for system upgrades, but added that many consumers were eager to see it implemented sooner because of the clear benefits.

“We would like to see it enforced as quickly as possible, but 18 months is a practical timeline for the industry to adapt,” she added.

The Bill has been welcomed by car buyers and consumer groups, who say it ensured fairer treatment for borrowers and encouraged responsible lending.

Economist Prof Emeritus Dr Barjoyai Bardai said the amendment corrected long-standing imbalances that favoured lenders under Rule 78.

“Previously, borrowers paid most of their interest in the first half of the loan tenure, meaning early settlements gave them little savings.

“The reducing balance method fixes that, as interest is now charged only on the remaining loan amount,” he said, adding that the change could also boost vehicle demand, as car ownership would feel more affordable.

“Borrowers will have more incentive to take shorter loan terms and repay early.

“For used-car buyers, whose loans are typically shorter, this makes a meaningful difference,” he added.

Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid said the reform would not drastically change loan costs but would improve transparency.

“Borrowers will understand their true repayment rates and be able to make better comparisons across banks,” he said, adding that the introduction of EIR would also help promote financial literacy and more informed borrowing decisions.

“As consumers become more aware of how banking products are structured and priced, they’ll make wiser choices.

“This is a shift toward better practice and a more transparent market,” he said.

Saturday, 25 October 2025

Mass Protests Erupt in Malaysia as Trump Faces Outrage Over Gaza at ASEAN Summit



 

https://www.ndtv.com/video/he-s-not-welcome-on-malaysian-soil-hundreds-protest-trumps-upcoming-asean-summit-visit-1012945

Hundreds of protesters took to the streets of Kuala Lumpur where U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to arrive for the ASEAN Summit, triggering widespread outrage over his stance on Gaza and U.S. support for Israel. Led by Malaysia’s Islamist PAS party, demonstrators waved Palestinian flags and chanted anti-Trump slogans outside the U.S. Embassy and summit venues. Riot police were deployed across the city as tensions flared, though Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim urged protesters to remain peaceful. The demonstrations underscored growing anger across Southeast Asia toward Washington’s Middle East policy. Despite the chaos, Trump’s visit marks the first time a U.S. president has visited Malaysia in a decade, the last being Barack Obama in 2015. #TrumpASEANSummit #MalaysiaProtests #GazaWar #AnwarIbrahim #ASEAN2025 #TrumpInAsia India Today Global is an India-based news channel that serves as an international arm of India's prominent media organization. It aims to provide factual, up-to-date news, analysis, and insights from India and around the world. The channel delivers a mix of content, including political news, business updates, entertainment, and cultural stories, focusing on both India-centric news and broader global issues. India Today Global features expert commentary, interviews, and in-depth reporting on key developments in India, as well as how they intersect with global events. It is known for its reputation as a trusted source of news in India. India Today Global is designed to cater to the Indian diaspora in the US while also appealing to international viewers interested in South Asian affairs and perspectives on global news. It's the English news brand that understands and fits perfectly into the digital-first lifestyles of our English news audiences. The marquee shows of our channel are: Statecraft: Our Executive Editor Geeta Mohan decodes the truth, cut out the noise, and present you the real facts that shape your world. We'll dissect the narratives spun by competing interests, analyze the subtle shifts in geopolitical landscapes, and illuminate the underlying forces that drive international relations. Expect rigorous analysis, informed perspectives, and a commitment to clarity in a world often obscured by deliberate ambiguity. We'll explore the economic levers, the military strategies, and the cultural influences that intertwine to form the complex tapestry of global power. Join us as we navigate the corridors of influence and reveal the hidden mechanisms that govern our interconnected world. Threadbare: We dive deep into global politics to unwind myths and expose false narratives shaping the world. Our episodes tackle disinformation, political information, and geopolitical myths to provide fact-based insights. Stay informed with in-depth analysis on international relations, political crisis, and global events. If you're interested in debunking political myths, exploring truth behind media narratives, and understanding the real forces driving global politics, this playlist is for you!
 
Related posts:

Moon race on a deadline
A Long March-2F rocket, carrying the Shenzhou-19 spacecraft and a crew of three astronauts, lifts off from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Cent...

Do not misread China, Victor Gao on How the US Misunderstands China
    Video link https://youtube.com/shorts/3NwjMutfLRg?feature=share  


Wednesday, 22 October 2025

Moon race on a deadline

A Long March-2F rocket, carrying the Shenzhou-19 spacecraft and a crew of three astronauts, lifts off from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Centre in the Gobi Desert, northwest China. — TNS

“If you really want to beat the Chinese, give Nasa the funding and stabi­lity it needs. You’re not going to win if every week there’s a new direction, a new budget, a new administrator.” -by  G. Scott,Hubbard

EARLY in his first term, US President Donald Trump held a modest ceremony directing Nasa to return humans to the moon for the first time in half a century – a lofty goal with no clear road map.Veterans of the space community were torn between excitement and concern.Was Trump offering a windfall to aerospace contractors or charting a genuine strategic vision to reclaim American ­leadership in space?The idea wasn’t new.

President George W. Bush had proposed a similar plan in 2004, only for Barack Obama to abandon it six years later.

For decades, Nasa wrestled with the question of whether to return to the moon or leap straight to Mars – each path promi­sing scientific glory but demanding vast, steady funding from a fickle Congress.

Eight years on, that debate is over.

Trump’s revived lunar policy has igni­ted a new space race – this time with China – and the countdown is already on.

Both nations are targeting manned lunar landings by 2029, a symbolic year marking the end of Trump’s presidency and the 80th anniversary of the People’s Republic of China.

But unlike the Cold War’s first space race, this contest is not about planting flags. It’s about who gets to stay.

Washington’s Artemis programme aims to establish a permanent base to test life beyond Earth.

Beijing has similar ambitions – and ­ both are zeroing in on the same spot: the moon’s South Pole, where peaks of eternal sunlight border deep, shadowed craters believed to contain frozen water.

Whichever nation establishes a foothold first could claim the region – and the resources – for itself.

“The bottom line is, yes, it’s doable,” said G. Scott Hubbard, a veteran of human space exploration and Nasa’s first “Mars czar”.

“But it’ll take intense effort and proper funding. It’s not inconceivable – but it’s a stretch.”

Nasa officials fear that funding cuts and private-sector delays could hand China an early lead.

The Trump administration has proposed slashing the agency’s research budget by nearly half, fuelling uncertainty within Nasa at a critical moment.

“There’s too much uncertainty,” said one official. “Inside headquarters, everyone’s walking on eggshells.”

In the 1960s, the US government poured 4.4% of GDP into Nasa to win the space race.

Today, the share is less than 0.5%.

White House officials insist Trump is committed to making “American leadership in space great again”.

Acting Nasa administrator and Trans­portation Secretary Sean Duffy said: “Being first and beating China matters because it sets the rules of the road. Those who lead in space lead on Earth.”

Beijing, meanwhile, is steadily ticking off milestones. It recently launched its Lanyue lander – built to carry two taiko­nauts (China’s term for astronauts) – validating its take-off and landing systems, according to state media.

Two tests of its new Long March 10 super-heavy rocket were declared “complete successes” by the China Manned Space Agency.

“They’re progressing on every key piece they’ll need,” said Dean Cheng, a China expert at the US Institute of Peace. “They’ve built a new rocket, a lunar lander and they’re moving faster than anyone expected.”

China has accelerated its timeline from 2035 to 2029 and plans to start building a joint lunar research base with Russia by 2030, most likely at the South Pole.

“There’s room for two powers – but not without coordination,” warned Thomas Gonzalez Roberts, a space policy scholar at Georgia Tech. “Competition for the same landing sites could turn risky.”

China’s goal, experts say, is to arrive first and establish broad control – securing access routes, communications, dig sites and even a nuclear reactor to power its base.

Nasa’s own plans depend on Elon Musk’s Starship rocket – a giant, reusable launcher built by SpaceX and central to Trump’s Artemis vision.

But repeated test failures have put the schedule in jeopardy.

“Starship has yet to reach orbit,” Hubbard said. “And once it does, it’ll need to prove it can transfer cryogenic fuel in space – something never done before. Doing all that within two years is a real stretch.”

Delays have already pushed Artemis III, the first planned lunar landing, towards the end of Trump’s term.

Artemis II – a manned orbit around the moon – is expected early next year after design flaws in Lockheed Martin’s Orion capsule were fixed.

Trump’s aides fear Beijing could deploy a nuclear reactor on the moon by 2029, allowing it to declare a “keep-out zone” and block American operations nearby.

Duffy has ordered Nasa to prepare a competing US reactor mission by the same year.

Yet, uncertainty persists.

Trump has not nominated a permanent Nasa administrator and the White House declined to identify who is overseeing the lunar effort.

Even Trump’s broader space agenda is shaky.

His administration has proposed ­cancelling funding for Nasa’s Mars Sample Return mission, a cornerstone of planetary science, despite evidence that the Red Planet once supported life.

Setbacks are part of the space game, but China’s pace has turned them into a liabi­lity.

If Beijing lands first, it would not just be a symbolic victory – it could reshape power dynamics on Earth.

“I’ve been on the inside,” Hubbard said. “You waste enormous time fighting budget battles.

“If you really want to beat the Chinese, give Nasa the funding and stabi­lity it needs. You’re not going to win if every week there’s a new direction, a new budget, a new administrator.”

Then he paused. “And China may still win,” he said. “That would be another claim that they’re the dominant power in the world.” — Los Angeles Times/TNS

Relates posts:

Do not misread China, Victor Gao on How the US Misunderstands China