Share This

Tuesday, 22 April 2025

US dollar’s monopoly in payments will soon be over

 

Safe asset: US dollars being displayed at the Vietnam International Bank in Hanoi. The risk is rising that the greenback’s monopoly in payments is headed for the history books. — Reuters

THE social-media video where Donald Trump’s artificial intelligence (AI) avatar is making Nike sneakers may be just a spoof on the United States president’s quixotic bid to re-industrialise America by eliminating bilateral trade deficits.

But the meme contains a kernel of truth.

The world’s farmers, fishermen, and factory workers labour hard to earn the US$100 bill that the US Federal Reserve (Fed) prints at no cost.

This exalted status, which a French politician from the 1960s termed as the US dollar’s “exorbitant privilege,” has been taken to a breaking point by the tariff war.

No matter what happens in the long run to the United States currency’s value or its role as a safe haven for central banks and private investors, one thing is clear: The greenback’s monopoly in payments, whereby it’s exchanged in 88% of all trades, is headed for the history books.

A weekend trip to Vietnam brought that home to me.

In Hoi An, a 15th-century trading port repurposed as a tourist attraction, tailors and shoemakers pay for visitors’ taxi rides to their shops and shell out commissions to hotels for directing guests their way.

If they didn’t have to charge customers a 3% credit-card fee, they might be able to do more to nudge inveterate shoppers.

For instance, they could raise their prices by 1% and still throw in a dinner voucher for high spenders – if they purchase one more linen shirt. The buyers will be richer, as will the sellers.

The reason they can’t fund such sales promotions is the US dollar.

Or, to be more precise, a financial architecture built around the idea that a payment made on a foreign credit or debit card must set off a chain of expensive activity underpinned by the greenback.

For 18 major global currencies that settle without much friction, those costs are negligible.

But for the Vietnamese dong, and most other Asian currencies, they’re a burden, which a highly competitive apparel and footwear industry working on tight margins can’t absorb.

So it passes on all of it – and sometimes more – to a buyer who would much rather take the free meal.

Take my example. To pay the tailor in Hoi An, my bank had to obtain the local currency, which doesn’t have a liquid market outside Vietnam.

So my money most probably got converted into US dollars in Hong Kong. After reaching Vietnam, the funds got exchanged again into Vietnamese dong.

Almost 40% of the greenback’s US$7.5 trillion daily turnover comes from its role as a vehicle of value. Neither the buyer nor the seller has any direct interest in it. Yet they can’t transact without it.

Trump is aware of America’s special status: He has even threatened countries looking to come up with alternative global reserve currencies with 100% tariffs.

A high-profile disengagement with the US dollar – for instance, when it comes to Saudi Arabia’s invoicing of its oil – may not go down well with Washington.

What the White House can’t control, however, are low-profile shifts in the engine room of the payment industry.

Even before Trump’s inauguration, I noted that the world of money was splintering into Western and Eastern blocs.

The trade war may have accelerated the schism, though the separation is now more likely to be along a US/non-US axis than a West/East split.

I can already pay a Thai merchant in baht from my Hong Kong bank account by scanning a QR code.

Vietnam plans to establish similar connectivity with Singapore.

These links are between commercial institutions, with third parties providing foreign-exchange services.

However, some central banks in Europe are working with their counterparts in Asia to explore automated conversion using blockchain technology.

If the pilots succeed, there may be no room for middlemen – software embedded in digital representations of fiat currencies will act as money changers.

Ergo, there may be no need for the US dollar to act as a go-between in transactions that don’t involve Americans.

This is just one of the many experiments underway to boost the efficiency of cross-border retail payments. They’re underpinned by US$800bil in remittances by overseas workers.

And then there’s what tourists spend. In Asia, they’re staying 7.4 days on average, 1.3 days more than before the pandemic, according to Mastercard Inc’s latest data.

For a small business in a lesser-known beach town competing against larger firms in more popular holiday destinations, each hour is valuable – and an expensive payment system an irritant.

It has been tolerated so far because nothing cheaper was available, and Asian policymakers’ focus was on shipping goods to the United States, a much larger opportunity.

But everything has changed since the April 2 reciprocal tariffs.

Chinese President Xi Jinping was about to arrive in Vietnam just as I was leaving.

Beijing has been pushing the so-called mBridge initiative in which financial institutions can swap digital currencies issued by their central banks to settle cross-border claims.

If the Trump administration is going to upset friends and foes alike to pursue a chimerical vision of labour-intensive industrialisation, then it has to be prepared for geopolitical realignments, and an erosion of at least one form of America’s exorbitant privilege.

Those who still view the US dollar as a relatively safe asset may want to hold it, as long as the United States remains the world’s predominant superpower.

But for tourists buying shoes or shirts in Vietnam, the 3% extra charge on payments is an avoidable, anticlimactic loss after haggling for – and winning – a nice discount on the merchandise.

Rather than incurring outsize fees to Visa Inc and its partner banks, a dinner at Hoi An’s Morning Glory restaurant seems like a fairer use of my money – while I wait for the last buttons to be sewed on. — Bloomberg

-  Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services in Asia. The views expressed here are the writer’s own.

Related posts:

Ending the dollar dominance as USA Weaponising global money



US dollar’s monopoly in payments will soon be over

 

Safe asset: US dollars being displayed at the Vietnam International Bank in Hanoi. The risk is rising that the greenback’s monopoly in payments is headed for the history books. — Reuters

THE social-media video where Donald Trump’s artificial intelligence (AI) avatar is making Nike sneakers may be just a spoof on the United States president’s quixotic bid to re-industrialise America by eliminating bilateral trade deficits.

But the meme contains a kernel of truth.

The world’s farmers, fishermen, and factory workers labour hard to earn the US$100 bill that the US Federal Reserve (Fed) prints at no cost.

This exalted status, which a French politician from the 1960s termed as the US dollar’s “exorbitant privilege,” has been taken to a breaking point by the tariff war.

No matter what happens in the long run to the United States currency’s value or its role as a safe haven for central banks and private investors, one thing is clear: The greenback’s monopoly in payments, whereby it’s exchanged in 88% of all trades, is headed for the history books.

A weekend trip to Vietnam brought that home to me.

In Hoi An, a 15th-century trading port repurposed as a tourist attraction, tailors and shoemakers pay for visitors’ taxi rides to their shops and shell out commissions to hotels for directing guests their way.

If they didn’t have to charge customers a 3% credit-card fee, they might be able to do more to nudge inveterate shoppers.

For instance, they could raise their prices by 1% and still throw in a dinner voucher for high spenders – if they purchase one more linen shirt. The buyers will be richer, as will the sellers.

The reason they can’t fund such sales promotions is the US dollar.

Or, to be more precise, a financial architecture built around the idea that a payment made on a foreign credit or debit card must set off a chain of expensive activity underpinned by the greenback.

For 18 major global currencies that settle without much friction, those costs are negligible.

But for the Vietnamese dong, and most other Asian currencies, they’re a burden, which a highly competitive apparel and footwear industry working on tight margins can’t absorb.

So it passes on all of it – and sometimes more – to a buyer who would much rather take the free meal.

Take my example. To pay the tailor in Hoi An, my bank had to obtain the local currency, which doesn’t have a liquid market outside Vietnam.

So my money most probably got converted into US dollars in Hong Kong. After reaching Vietnam, the funds got exchanged again into Vietnamese dong.

Almost 40% of the greenback’s US$7.5 trillion daily turnover comes from its role as a vehicle of value. Neither the buyer nor the seller has any direct interest in it. Yet they can’t transact without it.

Trump is aware of America’s special status: He has even threatened countries looking to come up with alternative global reserve currencies with 100% tariffs.

A high-profile disengagement with the US dollar – for instance, when it comes to Saudi Arabia’s invoicing of its oil – may not go down well with Washington.

What the White House can’t control, however, are low-profile shifts in the engine room of the payment industry.

Even before Trump’s inauguration, I noted that the world of money was splintering into Western and Eastern blocs.

The trade war may have accelerated the schism, though the separation is now more likely to be along a US/non-US axis than a West/East split.

I can already pay a Thai merchant in baht from my Hong Kong bank account by scanning a QR code.

Vietnam plans to establish similar connectivity with Singapore.

These links are between commercial institutions, with third parties providing foreign-exchange services.

However, some central banks in Europe are working with their counterparts in Asia to explore automated conversion using blockchain technology.

If the pilots succeed, there may be no room for middlemen – software embedded in digital representations of fiat currencies will act as money changers.

Ergo, there may be no need for the US dollar to act as a go-between in transactions that don’t involve Americans.

This is just one of the many experiments underway to boost the efficiency of cross-border retail payments. They’re underpinned by US$800bil in remittances by overseas workers.

And then there’s what tourists spend. In Asia, they’re staying 7.4 days on average, 1.3 days more than before the pandemic, according to Mastercard Inc’s latest data.

For a small business in a lesser-known beach town competing against larger firms in more popular holiday destinations, each hour is valuable – and an expensive payment system an irritant.

It has been tolerated so far because nothing cheaper was available, and Asian policymakers’ focus was on shipping goods to the United States, a much larger opportunity.

But everything has changed since the April 2 reciprocal tariffs.

Chinese President Xi Jinping was about to arrive in Vietnam just as I was leaving.

Beijing has been pushing the so-called mBridge initiative in which financial institutions can swap digital currencies issued by their central banks to settle cross-border claims.

If the Trump administration is going to upset friends and foes alike to pursue a chimerical vision of labour-intensive industrialisation, then it has to be prepared for geopolitical realignments, and an erosion of at least one form of America’s exorbitant privilege.

Those who still view the US dollar as a relatively safe asset may want to hold it, as long as the United States remains the world’s predominant superpower.

But for tourists buying shoes or shirts in Vietnam, the 3% extra charge on payments is an avoidable, anticlimactic loss after haggling for – and winning – a nice discount on the merchandise.

Rather than incurring outsize fees to Visa Inc and its partner banks, a dinner at Hoi An’s Morning Glory restaurant seems like a fairer use of my money – while I wait for the last buttons to be sewed on. — Bloomberg

-  Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services in Asia. The views expressed here are the writer’s own.

Related posts:

Ending the dollar dominance as USA Weaponising global money



Sunday, 20 April 2025

A laughable American malaise, ignorance, Malays have no money

 

The United States is the world’s biggest economy, but it also has leaders who are still geographically ignorant. Their understanding of South-east Asia and Asia is quite farcical.

FIRST, US Vice-president JD Vance found himself being rebuked – for his disrespectful comments about “Chinese peasants”.

In a recent interview, when speaking about the effects of the Trump Administration’s tariffs, he said the US “borrows money from Chinese peasants to buy the things those Chinese peasants manufacture.’’

As expected, it earned a quick rebuttal from the Chinese Foreign Ministry while the Chinese social media set Vance on fire for his remarks.

Then came Conservative talk show personality, Bill O’reilly, who arrogantly suggested that President Xi Jinping had wasted his time with his South-east Asian tour, which included Malaysia.

In a typical display of haughtiness and ignorance, O’reilly claimed Xi was “wasting his time in South-east Asia because the Malays have no money.”

We do not know if the 75-year-old newsman used the term “Malays” to refer to Malaysians in general, or to pinpoint the Malay-majority population of Malaysia, or even the broader ethnic group found across South-east Asia.

But it is safe to assume that he had in mind the population of Malaysia. It also indicated his lack of knowledge of Malaysia’s diversity.

Like many Americans, he has probably never set foot in Malaysia and Southeast Asia. His perception of Asians is probably based on Hollywood movies where the white man is always sweating away in noisy, crowded Asian market places, where, for some reason, everyone is using chopsticks.

It doesn’t matter which Asian city it is, it is always chopsticks.

To his feeble mind, we are just Third World people living in slums who can’t even afford our next meal.

Well, is that a surprise? No. It has been reported that although the majority of Americans have travelled abroad at least once, a significant percentage (27%) have never left their country.

The report said the degree of international travel experience varies widely among Americans, with only 11% having visited 10 or more foreign countries.

So, it is very likely that the average American would not know what Asean is. They may know about Singapore or Thailand, but Malaysia could well be Mars for many.

O’reilly’s remarks not only reflect a gross misunderstanding of South-east Asian geopolitics but also insults millions of Malaysians and their South-east Asian neighbours who have built vibrant, culturally rich, and economically growing nations.

To reduce their global significance to mere economic labels is not only simplistic but also racially charged.

I am proud of Malaysia. So are most of us. We take the trouble to explain the location of our small country to foreigners when we are abroad.

The reality is that Malaysia is a middle-income country with a diversified economy that spans electronics, petroleum, palm oil, tourism, and increasingly, digital services.

Malaysia is certainly not a “shit-hole country”, as Donald Trump infamously referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador in an interview in 2018.

Malaysia’s economy grew by 5% in the fourth quarter of 2024, with a 5.4% growth recorded in the previous quarter.

Overall, Malaysia’s economy grew at 5.1% (2023:3.6%) in 2024, with a value of RM1.93 trillion at current prices and RM1.65 trillion at constant prices.

Gross national income per capita increased by 3.6% to RM54,894 from a marginal decrease of 0.2% (RM52,991) in 2023.

Kuala Lumpur and Penang are home to a thriving tech scene and a growing number of start-ups, not to mention some of the tallest and most iconic buildings in the world.

The Straits of Malacca remains one of the busiest shipping lanes on the planet, making it geopolitically indispensable.

Our streets are safe. No one gets shot in schools. The metro stations are clean, bright and the trains run on time. No graffiti covers the walls of the stations.

Our streets are not filled with homeless people and the zombie druggies found in many American cities. That’s Malaysia for you.

To call Malays “poor” is not just misleading; it shows a lack of understanding of socio-economic dynamics and how wealth and development are measured.

While challenges like rural poverty remain, as they do in the US, Malaysia has made remarkable progress in human development, infrastructure, and education.

For O’reilly to suggest that Xi is merely “waiting” in South-east Asia implies that the region is a passive playground for global powers.

Asean is made up of 10 member states – with Timor Leste coming in next – playing a critical but neutral role in regional security, economic integration, and multilateral diplomacy.

Malaysia is clear about the US and China. Both are important trading partners. We will give an equally grand welcome to Trump if he comes to KL.

In fact, Asean leaders are ready to travel to Washington DC to meet Trump to engage with him. But China is our neighbour. It’s just a four-hour flight from KL to Beijing, and from Kota Kinabalu to Hainan, it’s less than two hours. That’s how close we are to each other.

Regular visitors would know how far China has advanced and how it has lifted its people out of poverty.

The US, meanwhile, continues to lag behind in many sectors because it continues to think it is superior.

China’s engagement in Asean is a strategic economic and diplomatic initiative aimed at expanding influence, often through soft power, trade, and infrastructure investment under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

O’reilly’s condescending view of Southeast Asians is both analytically weak and morally offensive.

As one report said: “O’reilly’s remarks are laced with cultural superiority. Such commentary doesn’t just diminish the credibility of the speaker – it also poisons public discourse with half-truths and prejudice.”

O’reilly really should get off his moral high horse, especially since he is someone who has faced - and settled – multi-million-dollar sexual harassment suits with at least six women. It reportedly totalled Us$45mil (Rm198.3mil).

The hilarity of it all was highlighted by one “Rep Jack Kimble”, who had the world in stitches when he tweeted that “we aren’t the only beef supplier in the world, but China isn’t the only huge country either.

“If they’re going to pivot from us, we should do the same and start selling more of our beef to India.’’

He then went on to follow up with: “Okay, I may have misspoken. It seems exporting beef to India is going to be tough with certain Hindu beliefs.

“However, instead of selling our cattle that way, what if we ransomed them off? How much would India pay if we’d let it go?”

This “Republican Congressman” is fictional and the account is fake but his remarks cleverly parodied the attitude of people like O’reilly, who is not just ignorant but also obnoxious.

And we all remember Pete Hegseth, the Defence Secretary, who was stumped when asked about Asean during his confirmation hearing in Senate in January. He could not name a single member country of Asean.

That kind of ignorance would be downright comical, if it weren’t so serious.

By Wong Chun WAI chunwai09@gmail.com A veteran journalist, Datuk Seri Wong Chun Wai is currently the chairman of Bernama. The views expressed here are solely the writer’s own.

RELATED POSTS: