Share This

Friday, 10 September 2010

U.S. faces "Americanization" of terror threat

A man purported to be Faisal Shahzad is seen in this Al Arabiya television footage released to Reuters TV on July 14, 2010. REUTERS/Al Arabiya via Reuters TV/Handout
WASHINGTON | Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:11pm EDT
 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Nine years after the September 11 attacks, the United States faces a growing threat from home-grown insurgents and an "Americanization" of al Qaeda leadership, according to a report released on Friday.

Former heads of the 9/11 Commission that studied the 2001 attacks on New York and Washington presented the 43-page study, describing it as a wake-up call about the radicalization of Muslims in the United States and the changing strategy of al Qaeda and its allies.

"The threat that the U.S. is facing is different than it was nine years ago," said the report, released by the Washington-based Bipartisan Policy Center.

"The U.S. is arguably now little different from Europe in terms of having a domestic terrorist problem involving immigrant and indigenous Muslims as well as converts to Islam."

The report comes at a sensitive time for the United States.

President Barack Obama made a plea for religious tolerance on Friday as passions simmered over a Florida Christian preacher's threat to burn copies of the Koran, Islam's holy book, and plans to build an Islamic cultural center and mosque near the so-called Ground Zero site in New York City.

U.S. officials warn such cases could lead to a recruiting bonanza for al Qaeda.

The report said al Qaeda and its affiliates in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen had minimally established an "embryonic" recruitment infrastructure in the United States.

It pointed to convictions last year of at least 43 American citizens or residents aligned with militant ideology, and high-profile cases of recruits who went abroad for training.

"In the past year alone the United States has seen affluent suburban Americans and the progeny of hard-working immigrants gravitate to terrorism," the report said. "There seems no longer any clear profile of a terrorist."

Americans were also increasingly forming part of the leadership of al Qaeda and its allies. It cited the cases of:
* U.S.-born Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, who is now one of the top figures in al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. He is linked to the failed attempt to blow up a passenger plane over Detroit on Christmas Day 2009 as well as a deadly shooting spree at Fort Hood military base in Texas a month earlier.

* Adnan al-Shukrijumah, a Saudi-born operative who grew up in Brooklyn and Florida, who is considered to be a senior leader of al Qaeda's external operations.

* Chicagoan David Headley, who played a role in scoping out targets for the 2008 Mumbai attacks on behalf of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba.

"There is little precedent for the high-level operational roles that Americans are currently playing in al Qaeda and affiliated groups," the report said.

SMALLER SCALE ATTACKS

Much of the report highlights fears that U.S. intelligence officials have been flagging for years, including the rising prominence of al-Awlaki and other American recruits.

The Obama administration has authorized operations to kill or capture Awlaki and a secret CIA memo, leaked to the media last month, spoke extensively about how U.S. citizens were of great value to terrorist groups.

American intelligence officials also have agreed with another key point in the report that sees an increased risk of small-scale attacks on hard-to-protect U.S. targets.

In the wake of the September 11 attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people, the report said the intelligence community had wrongly believed that al Qaeda was intent on "matching or besting the loss of life and destruction" it had caused.

It is now clear that militants see operational value in conducting more frequent and less sophisticated attacks, which are harder to detect and require less high level coordination.

"American officials and the wider public should realize that, by the law of averages, al Qaeda or an affiliate will succeed in getting some kind of attack through in the next years," said the report.

Even the Pakistani-born American Faisal Shahzad's failed attempt to set off a car bomb in Times Square in May was extremely effective from a propaganda standpoint, given the enormous amount of media coverage it received.

"The best response (to an attack) would be to demonstrate that we as a society are resilient and are not being intimidated by such actions," the report said.

(Editing by Christopher Wilson)
Comments

Sep 10, 2010 7:51pm EDT
Yes. We will show them that we will not be intimidated. We will continue immigrating muslims by the thousands, and we will leave them alone until they blow us up, and then we will get them. After that, we will wait until they blow us up again ad infinitum. See how unintimidated we are? We will even smile while our heads are being sawn off. It is the American Way!
cecil91 Report As Abusive
 
 
Sep 10, 2010 9:51pm EDT
Don’t they understand that the US thrives on violence and war, each attack emboldens the warhawks. We make more bombs kill more people, create more terrorists. The only way to stop our war machine is to quit fueling it.

Thursday, 9 September 2010

UK Spending watchdog warns over academies' finances


pupils  
The study said many academies were "performing impressively"
 
The rapid expansion of England's academies programme risks being poor value for money, the spending watchdog has warned.
With one in four existing academies needing extra financial help, the National Audit Office said much tighter monitoring was needed.

It also found poorer pupils did less well in academies than in regular state schools.
The government said academies performed well and that it was reducing risks.

The NAO said these state-funded, privately-run schools begun in disadvantaged areas by Labour had performed impressively in their efforts on improving attainment.

But since coming to power, the coalition government has encouraged schools rated outstanding by Ofsted to apply for academy status, saying they would be fast-tracked.

'Bailouts' 

Many have been tempted to express an interest by the promise of more money and greater freedoms.

Academies operate outside of local authority control, often with business-based sponsors, and have greater financial freedom than regular state schools, which are audited by their local council partners.

The NAO report found academies were not only spending significantly more per head of pupil, but that one in four were likely to require extra financial support.

And the agency that now monitors them, the Young People's Learning Agency, is expecting to pay £8.5m to bail 10 of them out of financial difficulties.

Meanwhile, one in 20 of open academies are forecasting deficits.
The NAO also pointed out that in 2007-8 and 2008-9, there were half as many senior academy staff on salaries of more than £80,000.

The department had already recovered £4.1m in overpayments from academies because of an over-estimation of pupil numbers.

The NAO said: "The expansion of the programme increases the scale of risks to value for money - particularly in the areas of financial stability, governance and management capacity.

"With greater numbers of academies opening in recent years, the department's capacity to administer and monitor the programme has been stretched particularly, as funding is administered on an individual basis."
It also found potential conflicts of interests over academy sponsors providing services to the school they sponsor.

A quarter of academies surveyed said their sponsor was providing paid services.
The study warned that academies' performance to date was not an "accurate predictor" of how the model would perform when generalised over a wider range of schools.

Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, said: "Existing academies have been primarily about school improvement in deprived areas, while new academies will often be operating in very different educational and social settings."

Real power
  There was a need to re-state the aims of the new-style academies programme so that its performance could be measured against them.

The report also found that children from disadvantaged homes were doing slightly less well in academies than those in regular state schools.

The report suggested it was pupils from more advantaged backgrounds who were driving the fast-improving results at academies.

But Education Secretary Michael Gove said the report underlined the fact that academies programme was working well.

"We have already taken prompt action on the NAO recommendations, as we strive to strengthen the programme even further.

"The academies programme is helping children from all backgrounds to get a better education, that is why we are allowing more schools to become academies, and giving real power and autonomy back to schools and teachers."

Outstanding sponsorship 
  Chair of the Public Accounts Committee Margaret Hodge said: "Where schools are given more freedom, we need to know they are using it well.

"We will want to be assured that, as the programme is expanded, the controls to provide sound financial management and good governance are firmly in place.

"The department faces major challenges as it takes over from local government the responsibility for directly funding many more schools.

"We will want to know that it has the capacity to meet these challenges.
She added that it was is telling that some of the substantial sums of money originally promised by academy sponsors were yet to be collected.

Shadow education secretary Ed Balls said the new government's programme was a "complete distortion" of Labour's successful policy to turn around struggling schools.

"Michael Gove's rush to turn schools with more advantaged intakes and which are already thriving into academies, rather than under-performing schools in more deprived areas, is not only a perversion of a successful policy but risks becoming an expensive failure."

“Start Quote

Where schools are given more freedom, we need to know they are using it well”
End Quote Margaret Hodge Chair of public accounts committee
 
The NAO said: "The expansion of the programme increases the scale of risks to value for money - particularly in the areas of financial stability, governance and management capacity.
"With greater numbers of academies opening in recent years, the department's capacity to administer and monitor the programme has been stretched particularly, as funding is administered on an individual basis."
It also found potential conflicts of interests over academy sponsors providing services to the school they sponsor.

A quarter of academies surveyed said their sponsor was providing paid services.
The study warned that academies' performance to date was not an "accurate predictor" of how the model would perform when generalised over a wider range of schools.

Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, said: "Existing academies have been primarily about school improvement in deprived areas, while new academies will often be operating in very different educational and social settings."

Real power There was a need to re-state the aims of the new-style academies programme so that its performance could be measured against them.

The report also found that children from disadvantaged homes were doing slightly less well in academies than those in regular state schools.

The report suggested it was pupils from more advantaged backgrounds who were driving the fast-improving results at academies.

But Education Secretary Michael Gove said the report underlined the fact that academies programme was working well.

"We have already taken prompt action on the NAO recommendations, as we strive to strengthen the programme even further.

"The academies programme is helping children from all backgrounds to get a better education, that is why we are allowing more schools to become academies, and giving real power and autonomy back to schools and teachers."

Outstanding sponsorship Chair of the Public Accounts Committee Margaret Hodge said: "Where schools are given more freedom, we need to know they are using it well.

"We will want to be assured that, as the programme is expanded, the controls to provide sound financial management and good governance are firmly in place.

"The department faces major challenges as it takes over from local government the responsibility for directly funding many more schools.

"We will want to know that it has the capacity to meet these challenges.
She added that it was is telling that some of the substantial sums of money originally promised by academy sponsors were yet to be collected.

Shadow education secretary Ed Balls said the new government's programme was a "complete distortion" of Labour's successful policy to turn around struggling schools.

"Michael Gove's rush to turn schools with more advantaged intakes and which are already thriving into academies, rather than under-performing schools in more deprived areas, is not only a perversion of a successful policy but risks becoming an expensive failure."

Newscribe : get free news in real time

More on This Story

Related stories


From other news sites



Outside the Box: To know China, see the world through its eyes

Speaking Chinese without an American accent

Commentary: To know China, see the world through its eyes 

By Andrew Leckey 

PHOENIX, Ariz. (MarketWatch) -- Will the heavy national debt load of the U.S. turn it into another Greece? Could the U.S. cope if it was surpassed by China as the world's largest economy? Is the U.S. increasingly becoming a protectionist country? 

Those sound like loaded questions, yet they're fair game for an American interviewed on Chinese television, as I have been more than a dozen times in the past couple of years. You are responding on Chinese soil, after all, where the U.S. is a subject of intense analysis and criticism -- just as China is in the U.S.


Investors are bulllish about Brazil elections

Both candidates in Brazil's presidential election in October are regarded as safe bets for investors, according to Joe Harper of Explorador Capital, who says the markets are expecting continuity in the change in leadership. Claudia Assis reports.

Topics such as the value of the yuan and trade relations ignite intense feelings because economic growth, investment potential and national pride are at stake. Such issues are more politically demanding than when a question is asked about something less China-U.S.-centric, such as Russia's economy or BP's management.

It seems strange to label as emerging a nation with so many centuries of dynasties behind it, but global economic power is relatively new in this nation where ancient structures coexist with skyscrapers. As China chooses its own course, developed nations are suspected of conspiring to hold it back, whether through organizations such as the G20 or the policies of individual nations.

Volatility of Chinese markets is sure to continue, impacting the world just as it is affected by other markets. China's hot economy and real estate market have likely come too far, too fast, and cycles are unavoidable.
Nonetheless, the transition of China from a low-cost assembler of exports to the West to a major consumer of products and services and a seller of products to the rising middle class throughout Asia is ahead.

This likely will depend less on developed markets and more on emerging economies that need consumer staples, information technology and automobiles. There will be dramatic growth, despite the ongoing ideological, trade, currency, political and environmental differences between China and the U.S.

What China wants

Whether it involves investing, business dealings or debate, dealing with China requires mutual respect:
• Many Chinese take personally the criticism of government policy. While we are often loudly critical of our government, they consider China one entity that includes them. Outsiders criticizing it are, in effect, disrespecting the Chinese people and heritage. Harmony is important. Stick to facts when discussing issues of conflict and make sure your points stand on their own merit, which is not a bad idea no matter what the country.

• They know more about us than we know about them. Our clothes and technology were made in China, but our information is limited to news reports. They see our movies, follow the NBA, dine at KFC and Starbucks, buy Buicks and display posters of American actors and athletes in stores. They celebrate Christmas big-time, though not the religious part. Yet that's hardly a clear picture of America or Americans.

• Negative quotes about China from U.S. politicians are taken seriously by the Chinese, much as U.S. sports coaches tack negative quotes from rivals on locker room bulletin boards. The fact that many in Congress intentionally make statements to appeal to constituents is not always evident to the Chinese.

• When significant issues are brought up, Chinese of all ages point out that we should realize they've come a long way in a short period of time, even if where they're headed isn't totally mapped out. Bridging the gap between wealthiest and poorest will be one of the biggest economic tasks.

• Young Chinese are under pressure from country and parents to succeed, far more than U.S. young people. Chinese parents who grew up under a different economic system tell children to study and work harder. The one-child rule put added pressure on the young to succeed. Shopping malls throughout China are crowded primarily with those under age 30, indication of the younger generation's financial empowerment.

• And yes, the Chinese generally do prefer to deal with people they've gotten to know well. This isn't such a rare concept in any country, but friendships definitely build bonds that turn to business and shared information in China. Drive-by meetings won't accomplish much, while repeat visits are valued.

Americans these days study China much as they studied Japan 20 years ago -- with fear and a sense of urgency that we are about to be overtaken economically. I leave you with one last non-economic question posed to me by the Chinese host on a special talk show honoring legendary television news anchor Walter Cronkite:

Why was there no journalist of Walter Cronkite's stature in the U.S. who was able to draw to an end the war in Iraq as Cronkite did in Vietnam?

Sounds like a loaded question. But for an American interviewed in China, turnabout is fair play. After all, I always have my own set of loaded questions to ask the Chinese.

Andrew Leckey is president of the Donald W. Reynolds National Center for Business Journalism in Phoenix, and has been a frequent guest on China Central Television (CCTV) interview programs in Beijing.

Newscribe : get free news in real time